National News Desk

Mandatory MRSA Reporting in California

Posted by Jane Akre
Friday, February 15, 2008 1:42 PM EST
Category: Major Medical, Protecting Your Family
Tags: FDA and Prescription Drugs, Defective Drugs, Wrongful Death

California will now require reporting of MRSA outside of a hospital setting as a public health illness.

Image: MRSA

LEARN MORE

In an effort to get a handle on antibiotic resistant staph infections that reportedly kill 19,000 a year, California has become the first state to require the illness be reported to local health authorities.

This includes staph infection that are serious enough to require hospitalization or that result in death such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, or MRSA. MRSA now joins measles, meningitis and syphilis as reportable contagious public health illnesses.

MRSA can begin as a boil or skin abscess but can be fatal if it attacks organs. That is what happened to actress Alicia Cole, who nearly died from acquiring MRSA in a Los Angeles area hospital.

The order comes from the state’s public health director. Up until now trying to track the growing number of cases of MRSA has been difficult.  

This new reporting requirement applies only to cases that begin outside of a hospital or nursing home setting and in previously health individuals such as among school children.  

These co-called community-acquired staph infections are a particularly virulent strain USA 300 first found in San Francisco in 2001.  It is believed to be responsible for skin infection and infections of the soft-tissue found in ERs around the country.

The vast majority, approximately 85 percent of MRSA cases are tracked to medical settings.

Last month in the annals of Internal Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital reported a variation of USA 300 that was resistant to six antibiotics was “especially common among men who have sex with men.” The report has been called homophobic from some members of the gay community.

Last October, a Journal of the American Medical Association report finds that hospitals are the most likely place for one to acquire life-threatening MRSA but the state reporting requirement will not cover hospitals.

A Consumers Union spokesperson says the reporting requirement in California focuses on the smallest part of the problem in the community. Lisa McGiffert says “They want to focus on community infections, which they are not responsible for.”

In 2004, Governor Schwarzenegger vetoed a bill that would have required hospitals infection rate reporting although some counties such as San Mateo County has been reporting MRSA rates since 1995.

Meanwhile the Chicago Tribune is reporting today that MRSA incidents are rising in rural hospitals. 791 have died from the infection from 2004 to 2006. #

 


6 Comments

Comments for this article are closed.

About the National News Desk

Our mission is to seek the complete truth and provide a full and fair account of the events and issues that surround personal safety, accident prevention, and injury recovery.  We are committed to serving the public with honesty and integrity in these efforts.

Hurt in an accident? Contact InjuryBoard.com

Subscribe to Blog Updates

Enter your email address if you would like to receive email notifications when comments are made on this post.

Email address

Subscribe

RSS Feed

Add the National News Desk to your favorite RSS reader

Add to Google Reader Add to myYahoo Add to myMSN Add to Bloglines Add to Newsgator Add to Netvibes Add to Pageflakes