National News Desk

"Shouting Fire" - Health Care Debate Squelched By Fear Mongers (Part 1)

Posted by Jane Akre
Tuesday, August 11, 2009 9:43 PM EST
Category: Major Medical
Tags: Health Care Reform, Palin, Death Panels, Obama,

Sarah Palin, among others, are making unsubstantiated statements about proposed health care reform, scaring Amerians and changing the dialogue.

LEARN MORE

IMAGE SOURCE: YouTube, October 2, 2009/ Palin winks at America

Fear sells.

Advertisers have long known it. So does television news. And there is no shortage of fear mongering as the nation grapples with health care reform.

As if a coordinated effort, a number of individuals who seem to be attracted to the national spotlight, appear to be mucking up the health care debate with unsubstantiated claims of a Big Brother approach to health care.

The rumors, passed off as fact, are undermining fact-based debate and heating up the anger and hostility at town hall meetings where Democrats and the president are trying to discuss the specifics.

Today, NBC reports an anti-Obama protestor was waiting outside a town hall meeting in New Hampshire this afternoon. Network reporters, covering the president, blogged today they were watching him with the gun, not concealed, on a public street.

An attendee dropped a gun at a town hall meeting in Arizona last week.

Sen. Arlen Specter (D-Pa) confronted a barrage of sometimes hostile questions, boos, and jeers at a town hall meeting in Lebanon, Pennsylvania Tuesday, reports the Washington Post.

Sen. Specter said “The objectors have gotten ahead of the curve, and a rumor is a lot harder to dispel.”

Tuesday night President Obama addressed the hostility and hysteria.

“There’s been a long and vigorous debate on this, that’s what America is about. That’s why we have a Democracy but I do hope we will talk with each other and not over each other.” Because one of the objectives of Democracy and debate is we refine our views because maybe, not these wild misrepresentations that bears no resemblance to anything that’s actually been proposed.”

“Think before something horrible happens,” blasted MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann during a nearly 15-minute “Special Comment” Monday night.

Keith and Sarah

He was referring to Sarah Palin’s Facebook page about “Death Panels”.

This past weekend, former Alaska Governor coined the phrase “death panel” to characterize part of the proposed health care legislation. She issued a statement about the “disturbing details of the nationalized health care plan.”

“The America I know and love is not one in which my parents or my baby with Down Syndrome will have to stand in front of Obama’s “death panel” so his bureaucrats can decide, based on a subjective judgment of their “level of productivity in society,” whether they are worthy of health care. Such a system is downright evil,” she writes.

Blasting Palin as a, “clear and present danger to the safety and security of this nation,” Olberman tells his MSNBC audience Monday night, “There is no judgment based on societal productivity. There is no worthiness test. But there is downright evil, and Ms. Palin, you just served its cause.”

“You shouted fire in a crowded theater,” he says, referring to exceptions to the First Amendment that restricts speech if it incites public harm, such as shouting fire in a crowded theatre.

Unsubstantiated

The claim is extraordinary at best and unsupported by the facts of President Obama’s health care plan.

Associated Press reports that there is nothing in the plan that would set up such a dark scenario.

The provision, written by Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-Or), encourages patients to discuss living wills and reimburses patients who consult with doctors about hospice care and pain medications. The counseling is not required, the reimbursement stands no matter what direction you choose and it does not promote mercy killing or euthanasia.

Part of a living will, legal documents naming a power-of-attorney if you become incapacitated have been part of estate planning for the last 20 years.

In fact, the bill blocks funds for counseling that presents suicide or assisted suicide as an option.

Counseling for living wills is supported by the American Medical Association and the AARP is taking out ads this week that label as false the claim that government will take over end of life decisions.

The American Medical Association believes involving doctors is simple common sense.

"There has been a lot of misinformation about the advance care planning provisions in the bill," AMA President Dr. James Rohack said in a statement. "It's plain, old-fashioned medical care."

Sarah Palin is now calling for civility. #


8 Comments

Anonymous User
Posted by GregA
Wednesday, August 12, 2009 12:31 AM EST

Keith Olbermann is a clear and present danger to civility and intelligence in this nation.

Anonymous User
Posted by Denise
Wednesday, August 12, 2009 1:22 AM EST

Ok, you choose the worst picture of Gov. Palin, you filled your article with lots of words, yet said nothing of substance...the bill as it stands is 1,000 pages. While it doesn't specifically say that to choose death if confronted with cancer over age 60, looking at England and Canada, we know that older people are encouraged to make alternative decisions because they are kept on waiting list for months and years. I have personal friends in England that waited 13 months for a heart stint, in Germany never got chemo for treatable thyroid cancer, and in New Zealand, waited 3 1/2 years for eye surgery! We as older folks will be asked to make room for the younger. Our lives, our wisdom will not be considered. Listen to Our President tell a women that her mother's doctor can not consider her Joy of Life at 100 when she needs heart surgery, that she should consider medication to keep her confortable! Why do we want our gov't to take on that role? Why do we have to decide now, why can't we take this bill in small easy to understand pieces?

Posted by Frank Lurz
Wednesday, August 12, 2009 5:59 PM EST

Sarah Palin, queen mother of the abysmally ignorant, patron saint of the terminally stupid, and devoted champion of compulsive liars everywhere needn't worry about being put to death by some mythical "death panel" conjured up out of the diseased wasteland that rots between her ears. By far, the greatest threat to her survival is a chance meeting with any one of the thousands of this country's veterinarians well-practiced in putting an end to the suffering of poor, dumb animals.

Frank Lurz
309 Todd Way
Mill Valley, CA 94941

(415) 389-8311

Anonymous User
Posted by GregA
Wednesday, August 12, 2009 6:15 PM EST

Frank from Mill Valley, CA, chiming in. Did you get your talking points from Keith Olbermann, Frank? You have a lot of nerve calling Sarah Palin ignorant, considering you neighbor, Barbara Boxer, continues to inflict her stupidity and bigotry upon the U.S. Senate.

Anonymous User
Posted by richard
Wednesday, August 12, 2009 6:19 PM EST

GOOD JOB SARAH!

Posted by James Cool
Wednesday, August 12, 2009 7:10 PM EST

Frank:

Hilarious.

GregA:

How is Olbermann different than O'Reilly, Limbaugh, or Beck? If you feel similarly about them, then we've no quarrel.

Denise:

If our bill does not specify a system like those abroad, how do you feel justified invoking anecdotes from those systems?

Posted by James Cool
Thursday, August 13, 2009 11:53 AM EST

Prediction:

Greg and Denise never respond.

Anonymous User
Posted by Bruce
Tuesday, August 18, 2009 7:14 PM EST

Sarah Palin has always been in over her head. Her opinion is worthless. She probably developed it from reading all those different newspapers and magazines.

Denise: The systems in Canada and England didn't develop from employer based systems. A viable universal coverage in the US could never be the same as Canada or England. The goal of responsible reform would be to cherry pick the good features in their systems, and develop the rest in a unique way that works for the US.

Frank was vicious, but funny. GregA took a big bite of the bait and swallowed. He was choking so bad he could add nothing relevant.

I appreciate James' comparison of Olberman to Limbaugh, O'Reilly & Beck. While they all spout some truth buried deep in the tangle of twisted facts and lies, none of those people provide reasoned discourse that advances the discussion. TV is the worst educator. People should try reading a variety of sources from both sides of the issue. Most of the "anti" commercials I've seen were financed by large insurance companies. I looked it up.

Comments for this article are closed.

About the National News Desk

Our mission is to seek the complete truth and provide a full and fair account of the events and issues that surround personal safety, accident prevention, and injury recovery.  We are committed to serving the public with honesty and integrity in these efforts.

Hurt in an accident? Contact InjuryBoard.com

Subscribe to Blog Updates

Enter your email address if you would like to receive email notifications when comments are made on this post.

Email address

Subscribe

RSS Feed

Add the National News Desk to your favorite RSS reader

Add to Google Reader Add to myYahoo Add to myMSN Add to Bloglines Add to Newsgator Add to Netvibes Add to Pageflakes